EPISODES / Secrets of Sarawak Report - The Beginning of the End

ENCRYPTION, OPACITY AND VAGUENESS
Sarawak Report's optimum operational habitat


On January 27, 2015, Sarawak Report wrote an article, which prejudiced the decisions of a Judge of a legitimate Common Law Court - THE HIGH COURT OF SINGAPORE - with its frivolous, contradictory and illegal 'Judgment' in the said article.

This blog will present all the strong evidence available that proves Sarawak Report actually published "FABRICATED" materials - as determined by the presiding Justice Edmund Leow - in order to support its premature conclusions, premised on fabricated information.

The said fabricated information was provided to the Court by Dato Ting Check Sii, a disgruntled former “best friend” who had been proven many a times previously by the Law Courts to have been providing false testimonies, as evidenced by the sheer amount of cases he had brought forth and lost.

EPISODES / PILOT: Decoding the Tapestry of Lies

A TASK TO END ALL TASKS
It's nearly impossible to catch Sarawak Report's slick manoeuvrings, but only nearly

Founded by Clare Rewcastle Brown and launched on February 12, 2010, Sarawak Report describes itself as "a group of citizens and onlookers deeply concerned by the situation in Sarawak, East Malaysia".

Based in London, Sarawak Report claims to be an investigative journalism online news resource that offers "an alternative vision of justice, transparency and a fairer future in Sarawak”.

Amid its various exposés, a few interesting trends have been noted, including the questionable veracity of evidence presented in the notorious site and faulty predictions of Court cases, even before an actual Judgement is pronounced.