THE NINE QUESTIONS Panel is again reiterating that Clare Rewcastle Brown/Sarawak Report should return the money collected from the public in the event that she and her dungheap of a publication loses the case against her in London.
She should be made to pay for whatever it is that she should be responsible for and not extract the responsibility from the public's goodwill.
Goodwill which, in the highly likely event that she loses, will dissipate faster than one can say, 'FRAUD!'.
– The NINE QUESTIONS Panel
👇🏽
– The NINE QUESTIONS Panel
👇🏽
– - –
1.
2. RELATED: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE, QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION, CLAIM NO. HQ17M01386
3. RELATED: CLARE REWCASTLE BROWN'S INABILITY TO SHOW PROOF TO COURT BRINGS INTO QUESTION SHOULD SHE RETURN THE MONEY COLLECTED TO DEFEND HER CASE
3. RELATED: CLARE REWCASTLE BROWN'S INABILITY TO SHOW PROOF TO COURT BRINGS INTO QUESTION SHOULD SHE RETURN THE MONEY COLLECTED TO DEFEND HER CASE
– - –
CLARE REWCASTLE'S DONORS ACTUALLY GIVING HADI MONEY
Pakatuns are going to keep enriching Hadi and his lawyers, as Ms. Rewcastle is bent on delaying the trial past the 14th general election (GE14) just to prevent Malaysians from discovering what I have been saying all this while – that all the evidences she claims to possess are nothing short of fabrications wrapped around conjectures and hearsay, none of which are substantiated, none of which hold in the court of law.
REPORTED BY RAGGIE JESSY/THE THIRD FORCE
Clare Rewcastle Brown has taken you guys for a jolly good ride.Last Thursday, the disgraced British journalist failed to secure an extension from a London Court in a defamation suit brought against her by PAS president Dato’ Seri Abdul Hadi Awang. The suit pertains allegations that Prime Minister Dato’ Seri Najib Tun Razak solicited political favours from Hadi by bribing the latter RM90 million.The court’s decision followed Ms. Rewcastle’s repeated failure to file and serve her defense right up to the 30th of August 2017, a deadline stipulated within a court order dated the 2nd of August 2017 (see #2 below). Ironically, this is the same lady who spent close to two years telling Malaysians that she had truckloads of “smoking gun evidences” to prove the Prime Minister of Malaysia was corrupt and criminally perverse.
But the evidence has yet to surface.
Her first shot at redemption came during a Case Management hearing held on the 6th of August 2017. On that day, the Sarawak Report chief editor asked the judge to fix £800,000 (about RM4.5 million) as the amount Hadi needed to deposit with the court as security. In her defence, she told the court that that Hadi, being a Malaysian, could default in payments should she win the case.
But that didn’t go down well with Hadi’s lawyers, who cited the fact that she was at liberty to sue him in Malaysia should a default occur. Hadi’s lawyers further contended that their client voluntarily offered to deposit RM80,000 with the court, an amount they insisted was “sufficient and uncontroversial.” It was then that a discontented Ms. Rewcastle dropped a ‘bomb’, telling the judge that the Malaysian judiciary and its Prime Minister were “corrupt and complicit with Hadi.”
Can you imagine this lady?
Not only did that blow her chance to redeem her dignity, she probably infuriated the judge, who made absolutely clear that the court could not blindly label a sovereign state (or its judiciary) corrupt without sound evidence. The judge then fixed £14,350 (about RM78,000) as the sum Hadi needed to pay the court before ruling that Ms. Rewcastle needed to remit costs worth 15,000 pounds (about RM85,000).
And that’s just a fraction of the £700,000 (about RM3.8 million) Hadi’s legal cost is anticipated to snowball to. Still, did Malaysians ever wonder how the Sarawak Report chief editor managed to pay the court the 15,000 pounds?
Do you have any idea who forked that money out to help her stuff Hadi’s lawyer’s pockets with dough?
Well, you did.
That is, if you’re the typical Pakatun (Pakatan Harapan apologist) who is ever ready to bend over whenever Dr. Mahathir Mohamad desires you to. Yes you, the guy who blames PAS for breaking Pakatan Rakyat up and thinks it was Hadi who botched the Rafizi-architected Kajang Move.
Yes, you!
On the 25th of July 2017, Ms. Rewcastle gallantly announced that Sarawak Report raised over £30,000 (about RM160,000) to ‘defend’ itself against Hadi’s suit. That’s 15,000 pounds in costs already paid to Hadi’s lawyer, and another 30,000 pounds she paid her own lawyers just to try and get Hadi to deposit £800,000 with the court.
Now, we’re talking about 30,000 pounds in hard-earned taxpayer money that went straight down the drain, given that Hadi was eventually allowed a £14,350 deposit. And we haven’t even taken into account the £700,000 she will likely need to raise to pay Hadi’s lawyer should the PAS president win the case.
Tell me, who do we have to thank for all this?
Why you, the Pakatuns, of course, for helping Ms. Rewcastle enrich Hadi’s lawyers by taking the London court on a jolly good roller-coaster ride.
Interesting, is it not?
Even more interesting is the fact that Pakatuns are going to keep enriching Hadi and his lawyers, as Ms. Rewcastle is bent on delaying the trial past the 14th general election (GE14) just to prevent Malaysians from discovering what I have been saying all this while – that all the evidences she claims to possess are nothing short of fabrications wrapped around conjectures and hearsay, none of which are substantiated, none of which hold in the court of law.
Do you now see how this lady is milking money from her own supporters for a lost cause?('Clare Rewcastle's Donors Actually Giving Hadi Money..' – Raggy Jessy/The Third Force, September 2, 2017)
– - –
1. CLARE REWCASTLE'S DONORS ACTUALLY GIVING HADI MONEY
2.
3. RELATED: CLARE REWCASTLE BROWN'S INABILITY TO SHOW PROOF TO COURT BRINGS INTO QUESTION SHOULD SHE RETURN THE MONEY COLLECTED TO DEFEND HER CASE
3. RELATED: CLARE REWCASTLE BROWN'S INABILITY TO SHOW PROOF TO COURT BRINGS INTO QUESTION SHOULD SHE RETURN THE MONEY COLLECTED TO DEFEND HER CASE
– - –
RELATED: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE - THE ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION
Claim No. HQ17M01386
MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS LIST
Before Master Davison on 2 August 2017
BETWEEN
HONOURABLE HADI AWANG MP
Claimant
and
CLARE REWCASTLE BROWN
Defendant
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
ORDER
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
UPON the application by the Defendant by Application Notice dated 5 June 2017
("The Defendant's Application")
AND UPON hearing counsel for the Claimant and solicitor for the Defendant
IT IS ORDERED AND DIRECTED that
1. By 4pm on 23 August 2017 the Claimant shall provide security for the Defendant's costs (limited to the additional costs of enforcement in Malaysia) in the sum of £14, 350 by either paying the same into the Court Funds Office or by providing such other security upon which the parties agree or which the Court may order, and that in default of his provision of such security, all further proceedings on the claim be stayed.
2. No further application for security for costs shall be made prior to the Costs and Case Management Conference, save with the permission of the Court.
3. By 4pm on 30 August 2017 the Defendant is to file and serve her Defence.
4. The Defendant is to pay the Claimant two-thirds of his costs of the Defendant's Application (to include for the avoidance of doubt the reserved costs of the hearing before Master Davison on 16 June 2017.
5. The costs referred to in paragraph 4 above are to be subject to detailed assessment on the standard basis forthwith, if not agreed.
6. The Defendant is to make a payment on account of the costs referred to in paragraph 4 above of £15, 000 by 4pm on 23 August 2017.
7. Permission to appeal is refused.('In the High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division, Claim No. HQ17M01386', August 2, 2017)
– - –
1. CLARE REWCASTLE'S DONORS ACTUALLY GIVING HADI MONEY
2. RELATED: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE, QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION, CLAIM NO. HQ17M01386
3.
– - –
👋🏽 – - –
1. CLARE REWCASTLE'S DONORS ACTUALLY GIVING HADI MONEY
2. RELATED: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE, QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION, CLAIM NO. HQ17M01386
3.
– - –
RELATED: CLARE REWCASTLE BROWN'S INABILITY TO SHOW PROOF TO COURT BRINGS INTO QUESTION SHOULD SHE RETURN THE MONEY COLLECTED TO DEFEND HER CASE
"Sarawak Report's Clare Rewcastle Brown had famously collected £33, 513 to fund her defence in the London High Court. The legal suit initiated by PAS President YB Abdul Hadi Awang is revealing that Clare is having problems providing the necessary evidence to back her allegations, famously regaled through her aforementioned notoriously fake news mouthpiece. With this latest development in light, let's revisit what was written by Sarawak Report in order to solicit money through the portal Crowd Justice, and the NINE QUESTIONS Blog will let the readers decide whether such monies were well-spent, justified and whether those monies should be returned to the donors should Clare Rewcastle Brown be found guilty." READ MORE HERE
('Clare Rewcastle Brown's Inability to Show Proof to Court Brings into Question Should She Return the Money Collected to Defend Her Case.' – The NINE QUESTIONS Panel, August 31, 2017)
👋🏽 – - –
The NINE QUESTIONS Blog will return with more facts.
– - –
