FOCUS / SARAWAK REPORT REPEATEDLY FAILS TO GIVE COVERAGE TO MULTINATIONAL COURT DECISIONS

👇🏽
– - –

1.
2. RELATED: INVESTORS AND STAFF RELIEVED OVER COURT DECISION
3. RELATED: DIRECTOR FAILS IN APPEALS TO WIND UP SANYAN HOLDINGS
4. RELATED: NO PENINSULA LAWYERS IN EAST M'SIAN APPEALS CASE

– - –

What #SarawakReport has been neglecting to mention for well over three years – the actual court judgment(s).Throwback,...
Posted by 9Q4SarawakReport on Monday, November 23, 2015

– - –

1. WHAT SARAWAK REPORT HAS BEEN NEGLECTING TO MENTION FOR WELL OVER THREE YEARS – THE ACTUAL COURT JUDGMENT(S)
2.
3. RELATED: DIRECTOR FAILS IN APPEALS TO WIND UP SANYAN HOLDINGS
4. RELATED: NO PENINSULA LAWYERS IN EAST M'SIAN APPEALS CASE

– - –

RELATED: INVESTORS AND STAFF RELIEVED OVER COURT DECISION
"The Japanese partners had invested much time, effort and money in Sibu. I am sad that Ting would ask for the company to be shut down simply because he was not paid an extortionate amount of money or reinstated as managing director. It is disappointing that he would have so little regard for the welfare of many people who rely on the day-to-day operations of the company. It is my hope that Ting will heed the words of the many judges who have heard this case and work with us for the good of everyone instead of working against us for his own good." – Datuk Mohammad Tufail Mahmud, April 21, 2012

REPORTED BY THE BORNEO POST

SIBU, April 21, 2012–

Japanese investors and 1,050 workers of Sanyan Wood Industries Sdn Bhd here are relieved the Court of Appeal has dismissed businessman and former assemblyman Datuk Ting Check Sii’s claims against the company, and for it to wind it up.

The company’s executive chairman Datuk Mohammad Tufail Mahmud, representing the Sarawakian component of the joint venture company, yesterday said the company had over 1,050 workers.

Tufail said the Japanese partners had invested much time, effort and money in Sibu.

“I am sad that Ting would ask for the company to be shut down simply because he was not paid an extortionate amount of money or reinstated as managing director.

“It is disappointing that he would have so little regard for the welfare of many people who rely on the day-to-day operations of the company.

“It is my hope that Ting will heed the words of the many judges who have heard this case and work with us for the good of everyone instead of working against us for his own good,” he said.

EPISODES / Dramatis Personæ: Who's Who of Clare Brown

PUZZLING QUESTIONS | UPDATED AUGUST 17

Clare Rewcastle Brown doesn't actually give much out about details of her past, even present life, except in vague terms. These are then frequently punctuated and littered with controversies, names of individuals and/or issues that she would later expand at length, leaving the listener gaping in awe at her passion.

– - –
RELATED (1-2)
– - –

[1: FOCUS / CLARE'S CONTRADICTIONS–THE FORKING OF THE TONGUE – "After finishing university in London, [Clare Rewcastle Brown] went into journalism, spending most of her career at the BBC World Service. But she seized every opportunity to return to Sarawak, a place that never quite let her go." - Foreign Policy, March 13, 2013]~[2: FOCUS / CLARE'S CONTRADICTIONS–THE FORKING OF THE TONGUE – "I have happy childhood memories of Sarawak. I didn’t return until I’d grown up and established myself in a completely different world [back in the UK], but I’d always followed what was happening in Borneo. By the time I came back in 2006—ironically because I’d been asked to take part in an environmental conference that [Tun Abdul] Taib [Mahmud] was holding at the time—" - Clare Rewcastle Brown - Esquire Malaysia, July 21, 2015]

– - –

Hence, in the process of piecing together - and getting to know - the real Clare Brown from the frugal amount of legally available data out there, the NINE QUESTIONS Blog will filter out other irrelevant references and attempt to give the nearly hidden details she is sharing with us the prominence it deserves.

EPISODES / Secrets of Sarawak Report - The Beginning of the End

ENCRYPTION, OPACITY AND VAGUENESS
Sarawak Report's optimum operational habitat


On January 27, 2015, Sarawak Report wrote an article, which prejudiced the decisions of a Judge of a legitimate Common Law Court - THE HIGH COURT OF SINGAPORE - with its frivolous, contradictory and illegal 'Judgment' in the said article.

This blog will present all the strong evidence available that proves Sarawak Report actually published "FABRICATED" materials - as determined by the presiding Justice Edmund Leow - in order to support its premature conclusions, premised on fabricated information.

The said fabricated information was provided to the Court by Dato Ting Check Sii, a disgruntled former “best friend” who had been proven many a times previously by the Law Courts to have been providing false testimonies, as evidenced by the sheer amount of cases he had brought forth and lost.